Potatriotique

29 April, 2006

Iraq: Let Freedom Reign?

A snapshot from the Institute of War and Peace Reporting of everyday life in Iraq over the past few weeks:

Halabjans Resent Lack of Investment
Civil Servants Short-Changed
New Welfare System Overwhelmed
Female Politicians Fear Exclusion
The Growing Pains of Democracy
Child Labour Fears
Comment: Back to Baghdad

Halabjans Resent Lack of Investment

Stalled economic development has stirred unrest in this once-flourishing agricultural town.

By Mariwan Hama-Saeed in Halabja (ICR No. 174, 26-Apr-06)

Before the chemical weapon attacks, before it became a symbol of Kurdish suffering at the hands of Saddam Hussein’s regime, Halabja was known as one of the most agriculturally rich areas of Iraq.

Pomegranates, grains, grapes, tobacco and nuts grew in Halabja’s fertile soil. And those not working in the town’s thriving agricultural sector were employed by local factories.

Today, eighteen years after the Iraqi military launched chemical attacks on this mountainous town near the Iranian border, the factories destroyed by war remain closed.

The agriculture industry, which once employed about 90 per cent of Halabjans, never recovered after the 1988 attacks and the United Nations-imposed sanctions in the 1990s. Local products now struggle to compete with lower-priced imports.

“Halabja’s economy needs support,” said Arsalan Manucher, an economics professor at the University of Sulaimaniyah who is from Halabja. “Even after all that has happened in the area, it can be restored.”

Many people in Halabja, a town of about 80,000 in Sulaimaniyah province, feel betrayed because their economy remains stalled since Kurds took administrative control of the northeastern Iraqi region in 1991.

Their expectations grew when sanctions were dropped in 2003.

The lifting of the embargo led to an improvement in the lives of many Iraqi Kurds, but few in Halabja experienced any benefits.

Many of the survivors of the chemical weapons attacks still suffer dozens of different ailments, including cancer and respiratory issues, and there is no decent health care. The roads are not paved, and buildings hit during the Iran-Iraq war in the 1980s lie in rubble.

Last month, the memorial to Halabja’s chemical attack victims was set on fire during a protest over poor services during an anniversary of the outrage.

Security forces opened fired on demonstrators, killing a teenage boy.

:: Read on ::

Civil Servants Short-Changed

Authorities in Iraqi Kurdistan dump worthless currency on public sector employees.

By Wrya Hama-Tahir in Sulaimaniyah (ICR No. 174, 26-Apr-06)

Mohammad Ahmad, a 34-year-old civil servant in Sulaimaniyah, recently brought home a treat for his child: 2,000 dinar, a little over one US dollar, in change.

His three-year-old son’s response, “Is this is a trick?”

In Kurdistan, Iraqi coins are used to make jewellery and play games, and even children know they have no monetary value.

Since February 2006, civil servants have received 2,000 dinars of their salaries in coins, which in Iraqi Kurdistan are not accepted as payment for utility bills or to even buy a cup of tea.

“The government is getting rid [of the coins] by giving them to us,” said Ahmad. “It’s ridiculous.”

:: Read on ::

New Welfare System Overwhelmed

Hundreds of thousands of Iraqi families sign up for a more inclusive benefits scheme.

By Wa’d Ibrahim in Mosul (ICR No. 174, 26-Apr-06)

Many of Iraq’s poorest families should by now be benefiting from a new welfare support system, but only a fraction of those in need have received help so far because the civil service cannot cope.

The government created the Social Safety Net earlier this year as way of caring for the growing number of poor families.

It replaces the previous family welfare project which offered aid to needy Iraqis such as war widows and the disabled. The new scheme provides higher monthly payments and increases the number of people who qualify, paying out monthly benefits to groups such as the unemployed, low-income families and married students. Families which would have received up to 50,000 dinars (34 US dollars) a month before will now get between 50,000 and 120,000 dinars.

The government has allocated about 500 billion Iraqi dinars, or 341 million dollars, from fuel revenues to fund the scheme.

Hundreds of thousands of families have signed up for benefits, overwhelming branch offices of the labour and social affairs ministry, which have had difficulty handling the bureaucracy.

In a country where the government and economists estimate the unemployment rate at between 30 and 40 per cent, most of the individuals registering are jobless.

“I’ve registered my name on the unemployed list because my family is under a lot of [economic] pressure. I really hope it helps us,” said Ameera Hussein, a 25-year-old unemployed university graduate. “My dreams are much bigger than [this], but life is getting harder by the day.”

. . .

“We’ve had nothing but promises,” said Fakhri Majeed, a 39-year-old unemployed father of four with a degree in agriculture. “Our names are on the list, and we keep going from one office to another. We don’t know if we’re going to get anything or not.”

:: Read on ::

Female Politicians Fear Exclusion

Women who hold seats in parliament worry they will be passed by when posts in the new cabinet are allocated.

By Zaineb Naji in Baghdad (ICR No. 174, 26-Apr-06)

Women are being deprived of access to political power as parliamentary factions battle over posts in the forthcoming cabinet, female politicians from several parties say.

Female members of parliament say that they have been excluded from the months of negotiations over the cabinet, and that no woman leads any of the top parties or blocs.

The constitutional requirement that women should hold 25 per cent of seats in parliament has not been met; their representation stands at 19 per cent or 52 of the 275 seats. That position is mirrored within the individual political blocs in the legislature.

The limited political power that women have won raises questions about how effective their representatives in parliament and government will be in raising women’s issues.

:: Read on ::

The Growing Pains of Democracy

Despite greater freedoms, life has in many ways become harder since the overthrow of Saddam.

By Emad al-Sharaa in Baghdad (ICR No. 173, 20-Apr-06)

Abdul-Zahra Mohammed sold religious books secretly for ten years near al-Khilani mosque in Baghdad.

Mohammed, 42, said he was trying to earn an income for his family and publicise Islamic thought by selling the forbidden texts. But he was regularly harassed and chased by security forces, and lived in fear of Saddam Hussein’s regime.

Today, three years after the US-led invasion toppled Saddam, Mohammed’s business is flourishing. He now has a stand where he sells his books publicly and faces no threats of censorship.

“Iraq’s democracy is thriving, and no-one can take away any freedoms,” said Mohammed.

But Iraq’s experiment with democracy and freedom has received mixed reviews three years after the toppling of Saddam.

For large numbers of people, like lawyer Raja Hussein, 31, life has in many ways become harder since 2003. With democracy came American tanks, and as a woman she has faced many new hurdles.

“I used to work safely in the all the Baghdad courts,” she said. “But today I have to wear a headscarf for fear of being killed by [extremist] groups, because I’m not veiled.”

Like Hussein, many say that although in the past they were at the mercy of Saddam’s security forces, they now fear American Humvees with signs warning cars behind them saying, “Don’t get closer or you will be killed.”

Many are particularly critical of the fact that political parties seem to be split along sectarian and ethnic lines. Their frustrations are inflamed by the fact that Iraq has had a lame-duck government for four months and has been plunged into civil conflict.

And despite the fact that Iraqis enjoy more freedoms than they did under Saddam, they still fear random violence. The conflict in the capital is restricting freedom simply because people are too afraid to leave their houses.

All this means that although they support democracy, many do not believe it is being properly practiced in Iraq.

“What is going on in Iraq is a long way from the democracy that we’ve never actually had,” said Alia Talib, director of the international cooperation centre for media in Baghdad. “It was the will of Iraqis to live under democracy, not chaos, but that was never achieved.”

:: Read on ::

Child Labour Fears

Poor enforcement of labour laws leaves children vulnerable to exploitation.

By Jasim al-Sabawi in Kirkuk (ICR No. 173, 20-Apr-06)

In a crowded market, ten-year-old Mazin expertly navigates his way through shoppers and vendors. He wears a second-hand t-shirt and cheap sneakers and has an ice cream box slung around his neck.

Mazin, who did not give his last name, earns 3,000 to 7,000 dinars (two to three US dollars) per day doing seasonal work, which in spring means selling ice cream. He only went to school for two years and now helps support his family in Hawija.

But Mazin doesn’t miss school. His true love is soccer, though he only has time to play on Fridays, which Iraq takes as a weekend holiday. Otherwise he starts his day in the morning and keeps walking until sunset. “I’m the best player on the block,” he bragged.

Iraq signed the United Nations’ Convention on the Rights of the Child in 1989. However, provisions on child labour have almost never been enforced, in part because the economic sanctions imposed on Iraq in the 1990s had tough effects on poor and uneducated families, and parents frequently pulled their children out of school to work.

The US-led Coalition Provision Authority, which governed Iraq following the fall of Saddam Hussein’s regime three years ago, made it illegal for Iraqi children under the age of 15 to work. But child labour remains common and may be on the rise once again, because the country’s conflict is hindering economic development, experts say.

The US State Department noted in its 2005 Iraqi human rights report that children from the estimated one million Iraqi families living on less than one dollar a day were “routinely used as an additional source of labour or income”.

“It’s natural for us to see a large number of children under 10 years old doing jobs that they shouldn’t be doing, and the law prohibits it,” said attorney Abdullah Nazal.

:: Read on ::

Comment: Back to Baghdad

One year after leaving the capital, a reporter returns to a ghost town.

By Ayub Nuri in Baghdad (ICR No. 172, 13-Apr-06)

The first time I saw my country’s capital was in April 2003, ten days after the war. I went to Baghdad as a reporter and fixer, and for the first time I met Arabs from every province of the country. As a Kurd from Halabja, I was as much a novelty to them as they were to me.

Everybody was trying to find a job with the US army, foreign companies or news agencies. English-language courses started to open in Baghdad.

The economy was booming, and I remember people saying, “Iraq is becoming the 51st American state.”

I shared the dream of many that democracy would come to Iraq, that we were starting a better life.

After the war I travelled to the mass graves in Hilla province. Families were digging and finding the bones of their loved ones. I was sad to see that – yet happy at the same time, telling myself these would be the last mass graves in Iraq, and everyone would now live in peace.

I was a strong supporter of the war, and did not like it when anti-war protesters in other countries took to the streets.

But then I saw with my own eyes American Humvees driving over peoples’ cars in Baghdad. I saw with my own eyes American soldiers firing at a building where only civilians lived.

The hopes I shared with so many other Iraqis slowly dimmed as I travelled throughout the country and witnessed growing violence.

I feared I too could become a victim of the rising insurgency. I left Baghdad after strangers asked questions about me in my building and my apartment was broken into several times when I wasn’t there.

After moving back to Sulaimaniyah, I visited Baghdad only intermittently.

I recently decided to report from the capital for several weeks to try to understand the new situation there. After the two Shia shrines in Samarra were bombed in February, all I had seen and heard on the news was that bodies were piling up in the streets of Baghdad.

When I returned, I found not the energetic capital I had left, but almost a ghost town where militias roam the streets freely and residents are afraid to carry out even simple daily tasks.

:: Read on ::

26 April, 2006

But is it art . . ?

A woman, who claimed to have been responsible for an art instillation work, was today arrested in London after the five ‘artworks’-slash-’suspect packages’ sparked a substantial security operation. The 36-year-old was arrested on suspicion of causing a public nuisance.

Streets and houses in an area around Shephard’s Bush in London was evacuated and roads were closed off.

Some of the packages were cardboard boxes containing soft toys and training shoes with nails sticking out of them.

One, in Charecroft Way, Shepherd’s Bush, consisted of three cardboard tubes supporting a polystyrene “altar” on which stood some flowers and a note which talked about the loss of a “Pelagius”.

It read: “Your absence has gone through us like thread through a needle. Everything we do is stitched with its colour.”

You have to wonder - Was the woman quite the thicko, or are the UK authorities hyper-reactive? And, above all else, was it art?

25 April, 2006

“There has probably never been a defendant as difficult as this one… he will probably never appreciate the efforts you have made”

“There has probably never been a defendant as difficult as this one… he will probably never appreciate the efforts you have made.” - The words of Judge Leonie Brinkema to the defence team in the U.S. v Moussaui case. (Quote is from the BBC.)

The jury has retired to decide on Moussaoui’s sentence.

The prosecution says that “there is no place on this good Earth” for Moussaoui, and are seeking the death penalty.

The defence says that the Virginia jury should give him “the long, slow death of a common criminal” in prison, rather than martyrdom through execution.

We shall soon see which the jury opts for.

.
There are some interesting links on background information, etc. at that BBC page for those who are inteterested.

.

23 April, 2006

Returning from afar..

Apologies to any readers - so, apologies to me, then - for the lack of posts in the past week or so. Apologies to spammers, too, for not ignoring you properly; normal activities shall resume post-haste. (Any allowable comments, on the other hand, can now be moderated by the ever-so-slightly sun-kissed me from now on. Good times..)

Twas all thanks to a lovely break in London and in the Algarve, largely devoid of all things computery - and what liberation!

And so, I am now back in the Land of Ire. Time for a cup of tea.
C’mon Leinster!! ..Or Munster. ..Or whoever.. It is rugby that’s on this afternoon (as well as th’hurling), isn’t it..?

[Currently listening to: “Mushaboom” by Feist. - I had to share :-) ]

13 April, 2006

More on Moussaoui; et cetera

As the Moussaoui case proceeds through its final phase regarding sentencing, the defence is due to begin its case for the court.

A few days ago, Judge Brinkema issued yet another warning to the prosecution. This time it was to caution the prosecution in relation to testimony which appeals to the emotions [my description], which could be considered prejudicial; she intimated that overly prejudicial testimony can be grounds for overturning a death sentence on appeal.

It made me wonder: This is the latest in a number of warnings issued by the judge to the prosecution for matters that could jeopardise the case. My question is that if this is the first case - a test case, indeed - in relation to the attacks of September 2001; if this is so important to the prosecution and they want to have Moussaoui face the death penalty; if the prosecution is convinced of his guilt and if their case against him is “water-tight’; then why, oh why, have they on numerous occasions acted in such a way as to risk the entire collapse of this case?

The trial continues. The Court’s docket sheet can be found here.

UPDATE 11h43

In related matters, this time concerning Padilla, the following commentary:

The Supreme Court Denies Review in the Case of “Dirty Bomber” Jose Padilla, But an Unusual Troika of Justices, Including the Chief, Issues a Warning to the Government

By MICHAEL C. DORF

An interesting piece. Article available here.

.

Previous posts on this blog relating to the Moussaoui case:

- United States v. Moussaoui takes surprising turn
- United States v. Moussaoui - continued (albeit precariously)
- Discussion of the United States v. Moussaoui latest
- United States v. Moussaoui - Court orders issued
- United States v. Moussaoui - Publication of documentary exhibits ordered
- Jury to decide on death penalty in Moussaoui case; Carla Martin investigated
- Moussaoui deemed eligble for death penalty

7 April, 2006

Ireland’s government: Does it display “wilful blindness”?

    “Wilful blindness on the part of states to the ultimate purpose of extra-ordinary renditions is unacceptable. The focus on this matter must be on the purpose of renditions. Where there is a risk of torture, there shouldn’t be any resort to diplomatic assurances” stated Louise Arbour, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights at a meeting with the IHRC today.

- breakingnews.ie

The words, this afternoon, of the UN’s High Commissioner for Human Rights, Louise Arbour, on her visit to the Irish Human Rights Commission.

I wonder how long it will take for the Irish government to officially dismiss this, yet another, call for it to live up to its legal obligations, and inspect aircraft at Shannon airport. Any number of human rights NGOs will surely furnish them with all the details that the government may need.

(Previous post on this blog in relation to secret U.S. flights here. Previous post on this blog in relation to Mme. Arbour here. Also, useful aggregation of related news reports and press releases here and here.)

.

5 April, 2006

Signs that you need a break from the Blog O’Sphere: #1

I was about to tell someone today that I was listening to Richard Ashcroft.

Somehow, I was struggling not to tell them that I was listening to Richard Waghorne.

Which in itself is a frightening prospect. (Just joking.. ;-) )

Still, though, confusing these two?

Exhibit A: Richard Ashcroft

Exhibit B: Richard Waghorne

Who’da thunk it?

.

3 April, 2006

Moussaoui deemed eligble for death penalty

Zacharias Moussaoui has, according to RTÉ News, in the last approx. 15 minutes been deemed eligble for the death penalty by the jury in his trial, as announced from the steps of the courthouse in Virginia.

(Previous posts on this blog in relation to the Moussaoui case can be found here, here, here, here, here and here.)

More later.

UPDATE (21h35)

The RTÉ report:

Moussaoui eligible for death penalty
03 April 2006 21:21

A US federal jury has found Zacarias Moussaoui eligible for the death penalty for his involvement in the deaths of 11 September 2001.

The 12-person jury found that Moussaoui lied to the FBI following his arrest three weeks before the attacks, and the lies led to deaths in the hijacked airliner attacks that killed nearly 3,000 people.

New hearings will now be held to decide if he should be executed.

Moussaoui is the only person to be charged in a criminal court in the US over the attacks on New York and Washington.

Though he was detained before the hijacked airliner strikes, prosecutors said he lied about the planned attacks, contributing to the almost 3,000 dead.

The jury panel of nine men and three women retired to the jury room last Wednesday to decide Moussaoui’s fate.

If the jury decides against a death penalty possibility, the only other possible sentence is life in jail without parole, though
prosecutors have signalled they are holding out hope for a mistrial and another shot at seeking execution, if the jury is unable to come to a unanimous conclusion.

The defense argued during the three-and-a-half week trial that government mistakes were as much to do with the failure to stop the attacks as Moussaoui’s obstruction.

Moussaoui pleaded guilty last year to conspiring to fly airliners into prominent US buildings but said he was part of a
separate plot to that of 11 September, a position he reversed during his trial.

See also: news search results from the web.

UPDATE (21h41)

- Washington Post report
- L.A. Times report
- Reuters report
- CNN report
- Al Jazeera report

.

Taoiseach opens offices of GLEN (Gay & Lesbian Equality Network)

Right. Today, Ireland witnessed a “historic” moment, and all the gays were “vindicated” when the Taoiseach opened the offices of GLEN (Gay & Lesbian Equality Network). Apparently. I was there, and so I suppose I should marvel at this “historic” occasion, and rejoice at my “vindication”.

Excuse me, while I find my queer Uncle Tom cap to doff.

The Taoiseach’s speech can be read here. In it, you can read about GLEN - which, seemingly, is Ireland’s “gay and lesbian community” - taking their “rightful place at the centre of our capital city’s cultural, community and civic life”. This “centre” is, somehow, The Liberties, where the GLEN offices are situated.

Right.

You can also read that “[w]e all want … all our citizens” to be “fuly respected”.

And here’s a choice comment: “All citizens, regardless of sexual orientation, stand equal in the eyes of our laws.” Really, Bertie? Can we hold you to that? Let’s place a wager, shall we?

Moreover, Bertie wanted to state clearly today - which he did - that “the Government [sic] is unequivocally in favour of treating gay and lesbian people as fully equal citizens in our society”. Is it? Well then, why aren’t we? Quite a little conundrum there, eh, Bertie?

It seems also, that “gay law reform” is something to be achieved, by GLEN. What, however, “gay law reform” actually is is beyond me.

The Taoiseach also went on to prattle for a good 10 minutes (or what seemed like an eternity) listing the various studies/reports/papers/etc. on LGBT people and equality. All this wonderful duplication/triplication/quadruplication - feck, I’ve lost count - is to be once again replicated, this time by the “working group” established by the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform.

The Taoiseach did mention the Civil Partnership Act 2004 in the UK. He then said, “Moreover,” although I think what he meant was however, “our written constitution gives rise to complexities that did not arise in the British case”. In other words, ‘Forget trying to force us to replicate the UK Act, I’m sticking to the latest report from the All Party Oireachtas Committee on the Constitution, and you can go to hell if you think otherwise - especially this side of an election. Jayses.’ Or some such.

Oh yes, and of course, the Ministser for Justice’s “working group” will be reporting to the Minister in October with an “options paper”, whatever the hell that is - and October just happens to be so very, very close to next year’s general election, as well as being the month that the Zappone and Gilligan case is heard in the High Court.

In fact, I just heard on NewsTalk 106 FM that a source close to the Taoiseach has said that there is no chance of anything happening this side of the general election.

So no surprises there, then.

And then, of course, An Taoiseach had the bloody nerve to inform the gathered gays:

Furthermore, the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform is currently preparing regulations to implement the Council Directive on the right of citizens of the [European] Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States. This will provide certain entitlements to the partner of a Union citizen where there is a durable and duly attested relationship. The procedures that will operate in this area are currently being developed.

Well, I can only assume the Taoiseach is referring to the Council Directive which emerged from the Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States, discussed in Europe around September/October 2003.

If that’s the case, then those regulations are being prepared by the Minister for Justice, despite this government’s attempts to oppose that very Directive, during it’s Presidency of the EU, no less: see here and here. Indeed, at the meeting to discuss the original proposal, Ireland was the only Member not represented by a Minister. There’ s commitment.

So you’ll forgive me if I regard the Taoiseach’s speech today as nothing more than complete and utter bull.

Coincidentally, I had with me today, a book by a Mr. Steven Poole, called Unspeak. Remarkable.

.

Get free blog up and running in minutes with Blogs.ie | Theme designs available here